Sexual harassment training is not just a checkbox. For HR, compliance, and legal teams, it is a practical way to reduce risk, document good-faith prevention efforts, and build a safer workplace. The challenge is that requirements vary across jurisdictions. California has clear training-hour rules and “effective interactive training” expectations. New York State requires annual training and provides standards and model resources. New York City has its own annual training rule for covered employers. At the federal level, Title VII and EEOC guidance set the baseline expectations for preventing and addressing harassment, even when there is not a single national “hour minimum.”
This guide helps you choose a training provider that matches your compliance footprint (CA, NYS, NYC, and Title VII), supports an audit-ready rollout, and delivers training people actually complete and remember.
Who This Guide Is For
- HR leaders managing multi-state workforces
- Compliance and legal teams building defensible prevention programs
- Operations leaders who need reporting, certificates, and training automation
- Mid-market and enterprise orgs that need scale, integrations, and analytics
What “Compliant Sexual Harassment Training” Means In Practice
A compliance-grade program typically includes:
- Clear definitions and examples of harassment and sexual harassment
- Reporting channels and anti-retaliation expectations
- Role-based guidance (especially for supervisors)
- Documentation: completion tracking, certificates, and audit logs
- A policy component: acknowledgment and access to internal procedures
Federal law (Title VII) is enforced by the EEOC and frames employer responsibility around prevention, reporting, and corrective action, even if it does not prescribe a universal seat-time requirement.
Legal Requirements Snapshot (CA, NYS, NYC, Title VII)
Below is a practical summary you can use to scope training needs before you shortlist vendors.
Compliance Checklist Table
| Jurisdiction | Who Is Covered | Training Frequency | Seat-Time Rules | Notes |
| Title VII (Federal baseline) | Many employers (coverage depends on factors like employer size) | No universal “hour rule” | Not specified as a single national minimum | Use as baseline for definitions, reporting, and response expectations |
| California (CRD / FEHA training rules) | Employers with 5 or more employees | Recurring cadence described by CRD guidance | 1 hour (non-supervisory) and 2 hours (supervisory) | Training must be “effective interactive” and cover defined topics |
| New York State | All employers must provide annual training per NY program materials | Annual | Not framed as CA-style seat-time minimums | NY provides standards and implementation toolkit |
| New York City | Employers with 15+ employees or 1+ domestic worker | Annual | NYC provides an online training intended to satisfy NYS + NYC | NYC training and FAQs clarify requirements |
Practical note: If you operate in NYC, you typically design for NYS annual training plus NYC coverage rules. NYC’s online training is explicitly positioned to satisfy both NYS and NYC requirements.
California Compliance (What To Look For In Training)
California is where many platforms fail quietly, especially on interactivity and role-based seat time.
Non-Negotiables For California Coverage
- Employer threshold support (5+ employees)
- Seat-time support: 1 hour employee and 2 hours supervisor versions
- “Effective interactive training,” not just a PDF or video-only module
- Coverage of protected categories, abusive conduct, and practical examples
- Records you can retain (completion proof) and export for audits
What “Effective Interactive Training” Usually Means
CRD describes “effective interactive training” and gives examples such as classroom training delivered by a qualified trainer and individualized, interactive e-learning created by a qualified trainer, with interactive elements rather than read-only content.
When you evaluate vendors, ask to see:
- Scenario-based interactions (not just knowledge checks)
- Branching questions (“what should happen next?”)
- A supervisor track that clearly meets the longer duration
New York State Compliance (Annual Training Standards)
New York’s program materials emphasize that employers must provide training annually and align with minimum standards. NY also provides a toolkit that includes checklists, policy standards, training standards, and a guide to instituting annual employee training.
When selecting a provider for NY coverage, prioritize:
- Annual training automation (reassignment rules, reminders)
- Policy acknowledgment capture
- Clear reporting exports for audits and internal review
New York City Compliance (Covered Employers And Annual Training)
NYC requires annual sexual harassment prevention training for employers with 15 or more employees (and coverage for domestic workers as defined by NYC materials). NYC also provides an online training intended to satisfy both NYC and New York State requirements, which is useful for smaller teams without an LMS.
If you are choosing a vendor, confirm NYC alignment by checking:
- Annual training cadence support
- NYC-specific coverage requirements awareness (not just “NY compliance” in general)
Key Features Of High-Quality Sexual Harassment Training Platforms
If you want training that holds up in audits and improves behavior, look beyond “course library” claims.
Training Experience (What Drives Completion And Retention)
- Scenario-based modules and gray-area examples
- Role-based learning paths (supervisor vs non-supervisor)
- Short lessons that can be completed in one sitting or in segments
- Knowledge checks tied to scenarios, not trivia
Example: Traliant emphasizes story-based training with interactive scenarios and learning games to increase engagement.
Administration And Compliance Controls
- Bulk enrollment and group rules (departments, locations, roles)
- Automated reminders and escalation for overdue learners
- Certificates and centralized training history
- Policy acknowledgment workflow
Accessibility And Language Support
For distributed or diverse workforces, confirm:
- Captions and screen-reader compatibility
- Mobile-friendly experience
- Multi-language options where needed
Scalability And Integrations (Mid-Market And Enterprise Reality)
If your rollout includes multiple locations, high turnover, or multiple jurisdictions, your training platform should support:
- SSO (SAML/OIDC)
- LMS compatibility (SCORM/xAPI where relevant)
- HRIS sync or bulk user management
- Multi-entity reporting (subsidiaries, regions, departments)
Reporting, Analytics, And Audit Readiness
Compliance training becomes valuable when you can prove it happened and learn from the rollout.
Minimum Reporting You Should Require
- Completion status by location, role, and department
- Certificate generation and retention
- Audit logs (who assigned, who completed, timestamps)
- Exportable reports (CSV/PDF) for counsel or regulators
- Overdue lists with reminders and escalation
If your organization uses broader compliance tooling, analytics and dashboards can help connect training participation to program health. NAVEX, for example, positions its analytics and reporting as a way to turn compliance data into dashboards and decision-ready reporting.
Pricing Models And Cost Considerations
Sexual harassment training pricing usually falls into one of these buckets:
- Per active learner per month (subscription)
- Per learner one-time purchase
- Tiered licensing by volume
- Enterprise quotes (often includes admin tools, integrations, and support)
Real-World Pricing Examples (For Benchmarking)
- ProProfs Training Maker: pricing referenced as starting at $1.99 per learner per month (varies by plan and use case).
- Apex Workplace Solutions: volume pricing shows $2.95 per person at 101+ licenses for a non-supervisory harassment prevention course.
- Individual certification style training: some providers list per-person pricing, such as $29.99 for a 2-year certificate (individual-focused).
Use these as anchors, then adjust based on:
- Jurisdictions (CA seat-time plus interactivity requirements can raise cost)
- Supervisor segmentation
- Integrations and SSO
- Reporting depth and admin features
Competitor Comparison (Practical Matrix You Can Copy Into Procurement)
Use this table structure in your draft and fill it with your shortlist vendors after demos.
| Provider | CA 1-Hr And 2-Hr Tracks | NY Annual Automation | NYC Coverage Clarity | Scenario-Based Learning | Reporting Exports | Integrations/SSO | Best For |
| Coggno | Yes (catalog-based, role options) | Yes | Yes (configure by location) | Varies by course | Strong (completion + certificates) | Optional depending on setup | Mid-market to enterprise teams needing flexibility |
| Traliant | Broad coverage positioning | Yes | Yes | Strong storytelling focus | Strong | Strong | Orgs prioritizing engagement + modern UX |
| NAVEX | Broad harassment coverage modules | Yes | Yes | Varies | Strong program reporting framing | Strong | Orgs combining training with broader compliance tooling |
| ProProfs | Depends on configuration | Yes | Likely | Varies | Basic to moderate | Varies | Budget-conscious teams |
| Apex Workplace | Strong CA focus | Limited | Limited | Story-based claims | Moderate | Limited | CA-centric training at volume price points |
(The point of this matrix is speed: it forces clarity on CA seat-time, annual automation, NYC rules, and proof exports.)
Coggno-Branded Recommendation (Positioning Without The Sales Pitch)
If you are evaluating platforms for a multi-state workforce, Coggno’s advantage is flexibility. You can build role-based learning paths (supervisors vs employees), choose from a catalog aligned to common compliance needs, and run training with centralized tracking and certificates. The strongest fit is teams that care about measurable completion outcomes, cost control, and the ability to scale training assignments across departments and locations.
Practical way to position it in the article:
- “For teams that want a configurable training hub with a broad compliance catalog and audit-friendly tracking, Coggno is a strong option to shortlist.”
How To Choose The Right Sexual Harassment Training Platform
Use this process to avoid selection mistakes that show up later during audits.
Step 1: Map Your Jurisdictions
List where employees work (including remote). Mark CA, NYS, and NYC specifically.
Step 2: Segment Roles And Training Tracks
At minimum: supervisor vs non-supervisor (especially for CA seat-time).
Step 3: Define Audit Proof Requirements
Decide what you need on demand: certificates, logs, exports, and policy acknowledgments.
Step 4: Shortlist 3 To 5 Vendors
Use the matrix above and eliminate anyone who cannot clearly support CA interactivity and seat-time rules.
Step 5: Run A Pilot
Pilot with one high-turnover group and one supervisor-heavy group. Confirm completion UX, mobile experience, and reporting exports.
Step 6: Automate Annual Retraining
For NYS and NYC, annual reassignment rules and reminders should run automatically.
Step 7: Document The Program
Store completion reports and policies in a compliance folder with a retention plan.
References
[1] proprofstraining.com. Best Sexual Harassment Training Courses.
[2] traliant.com. Sexual Harassment Training Courses.
[3] navex.com. Workplace Harassment Training Courses.
[4] linkedin.com. Top Sexual Harassment Training Companies: How to Compare.
[5] hr.university. Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Programs.
[6] apexworkplace.com. Corporate Account.














